Why Inferential Statistics are Inappropriate for Development Studies and How the Same Data Can be Better Used

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is twofold: 1) to highlight the widely ignored but fundamental problem of ‘superpopulations’ for the use of inferential statistics in development studies. We do not to dwell on this problem however as it has been sufficiently discussed in older papers by statisticians that social scientists have nevertheless long chosen to ignore; the interested reader can turn to those for greater detail. 2) to show that descriptive statistics both avoid the problem of superpopulations and can be a powerful tool when used correctly. A few examples are provided. The paper ends with considerations of some reasons we think are behind the adherence to methods that are known to be inapplicable to many of the types of questions asked in development studies yet still widely practiced.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

In praise of ecumenical Bayes.Michael D. Lee - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (4):206-207.
Statistical Inference and the Replication Crisis.Lincoln J. Colling & Dénes Szűcs - 2018 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12 (1):121-147.
The Philosophical Relevance of Statistics.Deborah G. Mayo - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:97 - 109.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-09

Downloads
1,839 (#5,498)

6 months
221 (#14,294)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Analytical economics: issues and problems.Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen - 1966 - Cambridge,: Harvard University Press.

Add more references