Hereditarily Structurally Complete Superintuitionistic Deductive Systems

Studia Logica 106 (4):827-856 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Propositional logic is understood as a set of theorems defined by a deductive system: a set of axioms and a set of rules. Superintuitionistic logic is a logic extending intuitionistic propositional logic \. A rule is admissible for a logic if any substitution that makes each premise a theorem, makes the conclusion a theorem too. A deductive system \ is structurally complete if any rule admissible for the logic defined by \ is derivable in \. It is known that any logic can be defined by a structurally complete deductive system—its structural completion. The main goal of the paper is to study the following problem: given a superintuitionistic logic L, is the structural completion of L hereditarily structurally complete? It is shown that, on the one hand, there is continuum many of such logics, including \, and many of its standard extensions. On the other hand, there is continuum many superintutitionistic logics structural completion of which is not hereditarily structurally complete. It is observed that the class of hereditarily structurally complete superintuitionistic consequence relations does not have the smallest element and it contains continuum many members lacking the finite model property. The following statement is instrumental in obtaining negative results: if a Lindenbaum algebra of formulas on one variable is finite and has more than 15 elements, then a structural completion of such a logic is not hereditarily structurally complete.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hereditarily structurally complete modal logics.V. V. Rybakov - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):266-288.
BCK is not Structurally Complete.Tomasz Kowalski - 2014 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 55 (2):197-204.
Towards structurally-free theorem proving.M. Finger - 1998 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 6 (3):425-449.
Metalogic of Intuitionistic Propositional Calculus.Alex Citkin - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (4):485-502.
Projective unification in modal logic.Wojciech Dzik & Piotr Wojtylak - 2012 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 20 (1):121-153.
Canonical Rules.Emil Jeřábek - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (4):1171 - 1205.
A(nother) characterization of intuitionistic propositional logic.Rosalie Iemhoff - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 113 (1-3):161-173.
Algebraic semantics for the (↔,¬¬)‐fragment of IPC.Katarzyna Słomczyńska - 2012 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 58 (1-2):29-37.
Two extensions of the structurally free logic LC.K. Bimbó & J. Dunn - 1998 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 6 (3):403-424.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-12

Downloads
49 (#317,389)

6 months
18 (#135,061)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Algebraizable Logics.W. J. Blok & Don Pigozzi - 2022 - Advanced Reasoning Forum.
Introduction to mathematical logic.Elliott Mendelson - 1964 - Princeton, N.J.,: Van Nostrand.
Modal logic.Alexander Chagrov - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Michael Zakharyaschev.

View all 19 references / Add more references