- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Resolving Some, But Not All Informed Consent Issues in DCDD—the Swiss Experiences
American Journal of Bioethics 15 (8):29-31 (2015)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Ethical and Equity Guidance for Transplant Programs Considering Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Regional Perfusion (TA-NRP) for Procurement of Hearts.Denise M. Dudzinski, Jay D. Pal & James N. Kirkpatrick - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (6):16-26.
More Nuanced Informed Consent Is Not Necessarily Better Informed Consent.Danielle Hornstein, Sharon Nakar, Sara Weinberger & Dov Greenbaum - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):51-53.
Can Informed Consent Go Too Far? Balancing Consent and Public Benefit in Research.Lauren C. Milner & David Magnus - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):1 - 2.
Integrating Informed Nondissent Into Informed Consent Standards.Alexander A. Kon - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (11):20-21.
DCDD and Children: A Defense of the “Best Interests” Standard.Pablo De Lora - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (8):21-22.
Informed Consent, Big Data, and the Oxymoron of Research That Is Not Research.John P. A. Ioannidis - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):40 - 42.
Harmonizing Standards for Death Determination in DCDD.James L. Bernat - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (8):10-12.
The Problem With DCDD Is the Dead Donor Rule.Michael E. Shapiro & Frances Rieth Ward - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (8):15-16.
CRISPR/Cas9 and Germline Modification: New Difficulties in Obtaining Informed Consent.Joanna Smolenski - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):35-37.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-07-31
Downloads
41 (#377,675)
6 months
8 (#506,113)
2015-07-31
Downloads
41 (#377,675)
6 months
8 (#506,113)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Ethische Relevanz und faktische Mängel in der Kommunikation von Spezifika der Organspende nach Kreislaufstillstand.Markus Christen & Martina Gloor - 2018 - Ethik in der Medizin 30 (4):343-361.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Addressing Consent Issues in Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death”.Kim J. Overby, Michael S. Weinstein & Autumn Fiester - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):3-5.
References found in this work
The Dead Donor Rule: Can It Withstand Critical Scrutiny?F. G. Miller, R. D. Truog & D. W. Brock - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (3):299-312.
Addressing Consent Issues in Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death.Kim J. Overby, Michael S. Weinstein & Autumn Fiester - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (8):3-9.
Ethically Informed Pragmatic Conditions for Organ Donation after Cardiocirculatory Death: Could They Assist in Policy Development?Jeffrey Kirby - 2013 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 24 (4):373-380.
The Institute of Medicine on Non-Heart-Beating Organ Transplantation.Alister Browne - 2008 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1):75-86.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo