Refutation of Some Arguments Against my Disproof of Bell's Theorem

Abstract

In a couple of recent preprints Moldoveanu has suggested that there are errors in my disproof of Bell's theorem. Here I show that this claim is false. In particular, I show that my local-realistic framework is incorrectly and misleadingly presented in both of his preprints. In addition there are a number of serious mathematical and conceptual errors in his discussion of my framework. For example, contrary to his claim, my framework is manifestly non-contextual. In particular, quantum correlations are understood within it as purely topological effects, not contextual effects.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Philosophical Implications of Bell's Theorem.Niall Shanks - 1987 - Dissertation, University of Alberta (Canada)
Against 'Realism'.Travis Norsen - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (3):311-340.
Bell’s Theorem: Two Neglected Solutions.Louis Vervoort - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (6):769-791.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-07

Downloads
5 (#1,519,079)

6 months
2 (#1,229,212)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joy Christian
University of Oxford

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references