- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Differences in epistemic practices among scientists, young earth creationists, intelligent design creationists, and the scientist-creationists of Darwin's era
In Roger S. Taylor & Michel Ferrari (eds.), Epistemology and Science Education: Understanding the Evolution Vs. Routledge. pp. 38--76 (2011)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Is Intelligent Design creationism?Massimo Pigliucci - 2009 - In Kendrick Frazier (ed.), Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience. Prometheus.
Young-Earth Creationists in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain? Towards a Reassessment of ‘Scriptural Geology’.Ralph O'Connor - 2007 - History of Science 45 (4):357-403.
Filozofia neokreacjonizmu amerykańskiego. O istocie doktryny inteligentnego projektu.Robert Piotrowski - 2006 - Filozofia Nauki 1.
Ultimacy and a new argument from design: Creationists, evolutionists, and the war about incommensurability.L. Groarke - 1999 - Ultimate Reality and Meaning 22 (4):307-326.
The Postmodern Sin of Intelligent Design Creationism.Robert T. Pennock - 2010 - Science & Education 19 (6-8):757-778.
Creationists Should Not Accept Quantum Mechanics.Charles W. Lucas Jr - forthcoming - Foundations of Science.
The Creationists: The Evolution of Scientific Creationism.R. L. Numbers & M. Bridgstock - 1994 - Annals of Science 51 (6):664-664.
The Creationists: The Evolution of Scientific Creationism.Ronald L. Numbers & William Kimler - 1995 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 38 (4):659.
Creationists versus evolution: a paradigm of science and society interaction.Rivers Singleton - 1987 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 30 (3):324.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-27
Downloads
2 (#1,799,226)
6 months
1 (#1,472,167)
2014-01-27
Downloads
2 (#1,799,226)
6 months
1 (#1,472,167)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Intelligent Design and the Nature of Science: Philosophical and Pedagogical Points.Ingo Brigandt - 2013 - In Kostas Kampourakis (ed.), Philosophical Issues in Biology Education. Springer (under contract). pp. 205-238.
The Implications of the Cognitive Sciences for the Relation Between Religion and Science Education: The Case of Evolutionary Theory.Stefaan Blancke, Johan De Smedt, Helen De Cruz, Maarten Boudry & Johan Braeckman - 2012 - Science & Education 21 (8):1167-1184.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-659b74868d-vwmnd uwo