Logical truth and second-order logic: response to Guillermo Rosado-Haddock

Manuscrito 31 (1):179-184 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In my response to Guillermo Rosado-Haddock I discuss the two main issues raised in his paper. The first is that by allowing Henkin’s general models as a legitimate model-theoretic interpretation of second-order logic, I undermine my defense of second-order logic against Quine’s views concerning the primacy of first-order logic. The second is that my treatment of logical truth and logical properties does not take into account various systems of logic and properties of systems of logic such as the Löwenheim-Skolem property.Em minha réplica à Guillermo Rosado-Haddock discuto as duas questões centrais levantadas em seu artigo. A primeira é que ao permitir modelos gerais de Henkin como uma interpretação legítima da lógica de segunda ordem, desvirtuo minha defesa da lógica de segunda ordem contra a visão de Quine respeito à primazia da lógica de primeira ordem. A segunda é que meu tratamento da verdade lógica e das propriedades lógicas não leva em consideração diversos sistemas de lógica e propriedades de sistemas de lógica tais como a propriedade de Löwenheim-Skolem

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Essay review.Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock - 1998 - History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (4):249-266.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-12

Downloads
18 (#832,589)

6 months
2 (#1,198,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references