Integrity in science: Moving into the new millennium: Commentary on "confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?" [Book Review]

Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):179-182 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11948-999-0007-8

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Commentary on "confronting misconduct in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?".Paul J. Friedman - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):177-178.
Integrity in science: Moving into the new millennium: Commentary on "confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?".Rosemary Chalk - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):179-182.
Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished?Nicholas H. Steneck - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):161-176.
Commentary on “the history and future of the office of research integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond” (c. pascal).Kenneth D. Pimple - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):203-204.
Commentary on 'developing a federal policy on research misconduct' (s. francis).Kenneth J. Ryan - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):273-274.
Commentary on "scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends" (b. mishkin).Debra M. Parrish - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):299-301.
Commentary on “changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempt to define research misconduct”. [REVIEW]Allan C. Shipp - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):155-157.
The Case of Vipul Bhrigu and the Federal Definition of Research Misconduct.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):411-421.
Assessing the Preparedness of Research Integrity Officers (RIOs) to Appropriately Handle Possible Research Misconduct Cases.Arthur J. Bonito, Sandra L. Titus & David E. Wright - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):605-619.
The american experience: Lessons learned. [REVIEW]Lawrence J. Rhoades - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):95-107.
Scientific misconduct: Present problems and future trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
Misconduct in science and the German law.Stefanic Stegemann-Bochl - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):57-62.
Commentary on “changing explanatory frameworks in the U.S. government’s attempts to define research misconduct”. [REVIEW]Margaret Dale - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):158-160.
Scientific Integrity in Brazil.Liliane Lins & Fernando Martins Carvalho - 2014 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (3):283-287.
The legacy of the Hwang case: Research misconduct in biosciences.Péter Kakuk - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (4):545-562.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
9 (#1,252,744)

6 months
1 (#1,469,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references