Determinism and Omniscience

Dialogue 9 (3):366-373 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many philosophers and theologians have thought that God's omniscience entails the truth of strict determinism. Many others, including most of the Scholastics, held that arguments for this view confused necessitas consequential and necessitas consequentis. I think the Scholastics were right. What I am primarily concerned to argue in this paper is that nonetheless great difficulties remain concerning the relation between God's knowledge and the fact that there are contingent events.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-25

Downloads
31 (#512,936)

6 months
5 (#625,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Freedom, Foreknowledge, and the Necessity of the Past.Larry Wayne Hohm - 1984 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Add more citations

References found in this work

Papers on time and tense.A. N. Prior - 1968 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 160:500-501.
Divine omniscience and voluntary action.Nelson Pike - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):27-46.
Formal Logic.Hugues Leblanc - 1962 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 27 (2):218-220.
XIII—Eternity and Sempiternity.M. Kneale - 1969 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 69 (1):223-238.

View all 7 references / Add more references