A Path to Understanding Guanxi in China's Transitional Economy: Variations on Network Behavior

Sociological Theory 29 (4):315-339 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Current research on guanxi suffers from conceptual confusion. This article presents a new theoretical framework for understanding guanxi in the face of China's economic and social transformations. Guanxi is viewed as a purposive network behavior that can take different "strategic" forms, such as accessing, bridging, and embedding. Pairing this conceptualization with a social-evolutionary framework, I argue that the emergence and increasing or decreasing prevalence of each form over time result from a combination of factors at three analytical levels—microagency, mesonetwork, and macroinstitutional—and endogenous processes of selection. By focusing on behavioral forms and their evolution, this framework is able to bridge divides in the guanxi literature, provide a foundation for comparative studies of network behavior across societies, and connect the study of guanxi with economic sociology more broadly.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Good Guanxi, Bad Guanxi?: Drawing the Line.Liu Goggin, Aidan Kelly & John F. Hulpke - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:297-312.
Good Guanxi, Bad Guanxi?: Drawing the Line.Liu Goggin, Aidan Kelly & John F. Hulpke - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:297-312.
Ganxi's consequences: Personal gains at social cost. [REVIEW]Ying Fan - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 38 (4):371 - 380.
Guanxi and OCB: The Chinese Cases. [REVIEW]Liang-Hung Lin & Yu-Ling Ho - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 96 (2):285 - 298.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
23 (#679,329)

6 months
1 (#1,464,097)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Tacit Dimension. --.Michael Polanyi & Amartya Sen - 1966 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Social skills and the theory of fields.Fligstein Neil - 2001 - Sociological Theory 19 (2):105-125.

View all 6 references / Add more references