The Epistemic Status of Photographs and Paintings: A Response to Cohen and Meskin

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67 (2):230-235 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1540-6245.2009.01350_3.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Are paintings and photographs inherently interpretative?Marcus B. Hester - 1972 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31 (2):235-247.
Photography and Its Epistemic Values: Reply to Cavedon-Taylor.Jonathan Cohen & Aaron Meskin - 2009 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67 (2):235-237.
Photographs as evidence.Aaron Meskin & Jonathan Cohen - 2008 - In Scott Walden (ed.), Photography and Philosophy: Essays on the Pencil of Nature. Blackwell.
The 'Fine Art' of Pornography?Christopher Bartel - 2010 - In Dave Monroe (ed.), Porn: Philosophy for Everyone. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 153--65.
The Epistemic Value of Photographs.Catharine Abell - 2010 - In Catharine Abell & Katerina Bantinaki (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Depiction. Oxford University Press.
Three kinds of realism about photographs.Jiri Benovsky - 2011 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 25 (4):375-395.
On the epistemic value of photographs.Jonathan Cohen & Aaron Meskin - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (2):197–210.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-11

Downloads
106 (#165,503)

6 months
10 (#267,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dan Cavedon-Taylor
Open University (UK)

Citations of this work

Photographically based knowledge.Dan Cavedon-Taylor - 2013 - Episteme 10 (3):283-297.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references