Response to Carroll

Film and Philosophy 5:108-109 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.5840/filmphil20025/613

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Response to Carroll.Alan Goldman - 2002 - Film and Philosophy 5:106-107.
The enjoyment theory of horror: A response to Carroll.Berys Gaut - 1995 - British Journal of Aesthetics 35 (3):284-289.
Indefinitely repeated games: A response to Carroll.Neal C. Becker & Ann E. Cudd - 1990 - Theory and Decision 28 (2):189-195.
Defining the Moving Image: A Response to Noel Carroll.Robert Yanal - 2008 - Film and Philosophy 12:135.
Replies to Carroll and Wartenberg.Bruce Russell - 2008 - Film and Philosophy 12:35-40.
Noemata or No Matter?: Forcing Phenomenology into Film Theory.David Sullivan - 1997 - Film-Philosophy 1 (1).
Noël Carroll, Philosophy and the Moving Image. [REVIEW]Thomas E. Wartenberg - 2022 - Film and Philosophy 26:143-148.
Response to My Critics.Thomas E. Wartenberg - 2010 - Film and Philosophy 14:123-134.
Response to My Critics.Dan Flory - 2012 - Film and Philosophy 16:162-179.
Response to Bill Pamerleau.Sander Lee - 2010 - Film and Philosophy 14:27-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-08

Downloads
12 (#1,114,703)

6 months
6 (#587,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Allan Casebier
University of Miami

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references