Generics and atemporal when

Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (1):49 - 98 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Beginning with analyses of English generic sentences and English plural indefinite noun phrases (e.g.dogs), we proceed to apply mechanisms there motivated to a characterization of atemporalwhen, a sense ofwhen which does not appear to involve time. Dealt with are such examples as Dogs are intelligent when they have blue eyes, and their relationships to examples like Dogs that have blue eyes are intelligent. The proposed treatment of atemporalwhen helps motivate the existence of a generic verb phrase operator in English, as well as the treatment of indefinite plural noun phrases as disguised definite descriptions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
67 (#242,046)

6 months
11 (#233,459)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregory Carlson
University of Rochester

Citations of this work

Generic terms and generic sentences.Greg N. Carlson - 1982 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 11 (2):145 - 181.
Restrictive if/when clauses.Donka F. Farkas & Yoko Sugioka - 1983 - Linguistics and Philosophy 6 (2):225 - 258.
Genericity and logical form.Kathrin Koslicki - 1999 - Mind and Language 14 (4):441–467.
Aspect, quantification and when-clauses in italian.Andrea Bonomi - 1997 - Linguistics and Philosophy 20 (5):469-514.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

A unified analysis of the English bare plural.Greg N. Carlson - 1977 - Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):413 - 456.
Montague Grammar.H. L. W. Hendriks & B. Partee - 1997 - In Benthem & Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language. MIT Press. pp. 5-91.
Some transformational extensions of Montague grammar.Barbara Partee - 1973 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (4):509 - 534.

View all 7 references / Add more references