Explicature and semantics

In Steven Davis & Brendan S. Gillon (eds.), Semantics: a reader. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 817-845 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A standard view of the semantics of natural language sentences or utterances is that a sentence has a particular logical structure and is assigned truth-conditional content on the basis of that structure. Such a semantics is assumed to be able to capture the logical properties of sentences, including necessary truth, contradiction and valid inference; our knowledge of these properties is taken to be part of our semantic competence as native speakers of the language. The following examples pose a problem for this view of semantics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conditionals and Propositions in Semantics.Daniel Rothschild - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (6):781-791.
What is Said?Andreas Stokke & Anders J. Schoubye - 2015 - Noûs 50 (4):759-793.
Formal Semantics: Origins, Issues, Early Impact.Barbara H. Partee - 2010 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6 (1).
Issues in the Philosophical Foundations of Lexical Semantics.Brian Edward Ulicny - 1993 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Why Propositions Cannot be Sets of Truth-supporting Circumstances.Scott Soames - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (3):267-276.
Idealisation in semantics: truth-conditional semantics for radical contextualists.Gabe Dupre - 2023 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 66 (5):917-946.
Insensitive Enough Semantics.Richard Vallée - 2006 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 10 (1):67-79.
Formal Semantics and the Algebraic View of Meaning.Eli Dresner - 1998 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
127 (#37,695)

6 months
127 (#141,279)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robyn Anne Carston
University College London

Citations of this work

Relevance theory.Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber - 2002 - In Deirdre Wilson & Dan Sperber (eds.), Relevance theory. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 607-632.
Unarticulated constituents.François Recanati - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (3):299-345.
Pragmatics, Modularity and Mind‐reading.Dan Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 2002 - Mind and Language 17 (1-2):3–23.
Generics in Context.Rachel Sterken - 2015 - Philosophers' Imprint 15.

View all 35 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references