Have the experts been weighed, measured, and found wanting?

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):81-91 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT Tetlock's Expert Political Judgment is a creative, careful, and mostly convincing study of the predictive accuracy of political experts. My only major complaints are that Tetlock (1) understates the predictive accuracy of experts, and (2) does too little to discourage demagogues from misinterpreting his work as a vindication of the wisdom of the average citizen. Experts have much to learn from Tetlock's epistemological audit, but there is still ample evidence that, compared to laymen, experts are very good

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Trouble with Experts.Paul J. Quirk - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (4):449-465.
The trouble with experts.Paul J. Quirk - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (4):449-465.
Kudos for the Mindless Expert.Sebastian Benthall - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):65-79.
Putting political experts to the test.Zeljka Buturovic - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (4):389-396.
Putting Political Experts to the Test.Zeljka Buturovic - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (4):389-396.
When and why do hedgehogs and foxes differ?Frank C. Keil - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (4):415-426.
Feyerabend's democratic critique of expertise.Evan M. Selinger - 2003 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (3-4):359-373.
Feyerabend's democratic critique of expertise.Evan M. Selinger - 2003 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 15 (3-4):359-373.
When and Why Do Hedgehogs and Foxes Differ?Frank C. Keil - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (4):415-426.
Is the public incompetent? Compared to whom? About what?Gerald Gaus - 2008 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 20 (3):291-311.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
53 (#99,339)

6 months
4 (#1,635,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Against Epistocracy.Paul Gunn - 2019 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 31 (1):26-82.
How Smart is Democracy? You Can't Answer that Question a Priori.Jason Brennan - 2014 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 26 (1-2):33-58.
Is the public incompetent? Compared to whom? About what?Gerald Gaus - 2008 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 20 (3):291-311.
The Trouble with Experts.Paul J. Quirk - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (4):449-465.
The trouble with experts.Paul J. Quirk - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (4):449-465.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references