Review: Reply to Rey [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 126 (1):155 - 162 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rey does not try to achieve an overall statement of the view he is discussing; rather, he fastens on to a series of individual passages in Reference and Consciousness and expresses disagreement with each of them. Most of his complaints rest on imprecision in his understanding of the relevant passage. To make it easier to match my responses to the detail of Rey’s comments, I have organized my responses to the four sections of his article under the same headings as he uses.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply to Rey. [REVIEW]John Campbell - 2005 - Philosophical Studies 126 (1):155 - 162.
Am I a Series?Jens Johansson - 2009 - Theoria 75 (3):196-205.
Physical and mental? Reply to John Searle.Anthonie W. M. Meijers - 2000 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 8 (2):179 – 183.
Replies.Bill Brewer - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):449-464.
Martial Again.Alan Ker - 1953 - Classical Quarterly 3 (3-4):173-.
Martial Again.Alan Ker - 1953 - Classical Quarterly 3 (3-4):173-174.
Hard incompatibilism and its rivals.Derk Pereboom - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (1):21 - 33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
10 (#1,204,152)

6 months
1 (#1,720,529)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references