Improvisation, Indeterminacy, and Ontology: Some Perspectives on Music and the Posthumanities

Contemporary Music Review 40 (4):409-424 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article I address some questions concerning the emerging conjunction of musical research on improvisation and work in the ‘posthumanities’, in particular the theoretical results of the ‘ontological turn’ in the humanities. Engaging with the work of the composer John Cage, and George E. Lewis’s framing of Cage’s performative indeterminacy as a ‘Eurological’ practice that excludes ‘Afrological’ jazz improvisation, I examine how critical discourse on Cage and his conception of sound is relevant to the improvisation-posthumanities conjunction. After discussing some criticisms of ontological and materialist approaches to sound, I consider the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) of Bruno Latour, posed as offering an alternative to these approaches. Following an examination of some limitations to ANT based around the themes of critique and abstraction, I draw from the work of Gilles Deleuze and Georgina Born to suggest that work on improvisation and the posthumanities may be fruitful, but must be part of a pluralistic mode of inquiry that does not reject critique and abstraction, as some work in the posthumanities has done.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-20

Downloads
204 (#16,478)

6 months
479 (#41,682)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Iain Campbell
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to the Actor-Network Theory.Bruno Latour - 2005 - Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
We have never been modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
On what there is1.Willard V. Quine - 2009 - In Michael Cannon Rea (ed.), Arguing about metaphysics. New York: Routledge. pp. 11.

View all 10 references / Add more references