From Frankenstein to gene therapy, a collective responsibility. A glance from (bio)ethics

Humanities Journal of Valparaiso 15:7-20 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Given the recent developments in biotechnology and genetic engineering, the ability to eliminate genetic diseases from the human genome seems more and more possible each day. Being able to do so would mean a better quality of life for those who would otherwise suffer from incurable genetic diseases. However, even though the success of such a procedure would bring benefits that cannot be obtained by other means, the consequences for humans are still unknown. As such, the people involved should be held responsible. The responsibility needs to be collective, not individual, because the decisions leading to the edition of a human genome and someone being born as a result of it are not made by a single individual, but several people, from the prospective parents interested in the intervention for their future child to the ones in charge of performing said intervention. The addition of the human genome can bring significant benefits, and it seems to be the only way to avoid certain genetic diseases; however, collective responsibility should be taken by those involved in the decisions that lead to a person being born with a modified genome.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Should we change the human genome?Torbjörn Tännsjö - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (3).
Orphan Tests.Leslie G. Biesecker - 1996 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5 (2):300.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-01

Downloads
14 (#1,020,370)

6 months
6 (#587,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Shared cooperative activity.Michael E. Bratman - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (2):327-341.
Collective Responsibility.Seumas Miller - 2001 - Public Affairs Quarterly 15 (1):65-82.

Add more references