Making sense of metafiction

Abstract

Event summary: The conference focuses on metafiction, taken to cover any fiction which represents itself as a fiction. Because metafictions acknowledge their own status as fictions, they are sometimes known as ‘reflexive’ or ‘self-conscious’ fictions, and sometimes generate apparently paradoxical results. The conference will explore what this reflexivity amounts to, how it distinguishes the metafictional from the non-metafictional works, and what impact this has on questions about the nature of fiction in general. Metafiction amounts to a significant – but not uncommon – distortion of the standard relationship between a fiction and what it represents. This two-day interdisciplinary conference will explore how metafictional representation works by bringing together research on the nature of fiction within philosophy and research on metafiction in literary criticism, film studies and art theory. Questions to Explore Understanding how metafiction works is important to understanding how fiction works. For it raises interesting questions about what fictional representation is, what distinguishes it from non-fictional representation, how fictions represent, how we engage with fiction, and what relations the representation bears to its contents. How should we accommodate metafictions within an account of truth in fiction? Are there any peculiarities of audience engagement with metafictions – do our emotional reactions to a scenario change if we are told by the work that it is ‘just fictional’? What are the different metafictional narrative techniques, and do they all have the same impact on the content of the fiction? What constraints, if any, do metafictions place on the ontology of fiction and the nature of fictional objects?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Fiction: A Philosophical Analysis.Catharine Abell - 2020 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Truth in interactive fiction.Alex Fisher - 2022 - Synthese 200 (6):1-18.
Truth in Fiction.Richard Woodward - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (3):158-167.
Time in Fiction.Craig Bourne & Emily Caddick Bourne - 2016 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Representing Fictions in Film.Christopher Paul Sellors - 2002 - Dissertation, New York University
The Mental Functions of Appreciating Fiction.Naoko Ishida - 2016 - American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 8 (2).
Blurred lines: How fictional is pornography?Aidan McGlynn - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (4):e12721.
Fiction and Representation.Zoltán Vecsey - 2019 - Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-12-08

Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)

6 months
36 (#102,577)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Emily Caddick Bourne
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references