Eating in Isolation: A Normative Comparison of Force Feeding and Solitary Confinement

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (3):414-424 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The practice of solitary confinement (SC) is established within the literature as a common occurrence of torture within the prison system, and many international and national human rights organizations have called for its abolition. A somewhat more contentious topic in the literature is the practice of force feeding (FF) of hunger-striking prisoners. The paper aims to make a case against FF by establishing a parity argument that states the following: If SC is considered an immoral practice (and indeed it should be), it should follow that FF is morally impermissible as well. In conclusion, this paper will argue that FF of hunger-striking prisoners is a violation of their fundamental moral rights and constitutes cruel and inhumane treatment and, therefore, should be abolished.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics briefings.Veronica English, Jessica Gardner, Gillian Romano-Critchley & Ann Sommerville - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (3):203-204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-25

Downloads
9 (#1,266,389)

6 months
5 (#836,975)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?