Review: R. D. Bradley, Must the Future be What it is Going to Be?; P. Wolff, Truth, Futurity and Contingency [Book Review]

Journal of Symbolic Logic 25 (4):344-345 (1960)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Truth, futurity, and contingency.Peter Wolff - 1960 - Mind 69 (275):398-402.
Present truth and future contingency.Rogers Albritton - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (1):29-46.
Review: R. Montague, Mr. Bradley on the Future. [REVIEW]Ronald J. Butler - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (4):613-613.
Contingency and Divine Knowledge in Ockham.Michael J. Cholbi - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (1):81-91.
Husserl's concept of the future.James R. Mensch - 1999 - Husserl Studies 16 (1):41-64.
The futurity problem.Gregory Kavka - 1978 - In Richard I. Sikora & Brian M. Barry (eds.), Obligations to Future Generations. White Horse Press. pp. 186--203.
Bradley and the impossibility of absolute truth.David Holdcroft - 1981 - History and Philosophy of Logic 2 (1-2):25-39.
F.H. Bradley and the Concept of Relative Truth.Sean Sayers - 1991 - Radical Philosophy 59 (59):15-20.
Naïve truth-conditions and meaning.Lionel Shapiro - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):265–277.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
2 (#1,800,073)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references