Sharpened lower bounds for cut elimination

Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (2):656-668 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We present sharpened lower bounds on the size of cut free proofs for first-order logic. Prior lower bounds for eliminating cuts from a proof established superexponential lower bounds as a stack of exponentials, with the height of the stack proportional to the maximum depth d of the formulas in the original proof. Our results remove the constant of proportionality, giving an exponential stack of height equal to d — 0(1). The proof method is based on more efficiently expressing the Gentzen-Solovay cut formulas as low depth formulas.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-05

Downloads
70 (#233,885)

6 months
10 (#268,644)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Proof Theory and Logical Complexity.Helmut Pfeifer & Jean-Yves Girard - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (4):1493.
The Role of Quantifier Alternations in Cut Elimination.Philipp Gerhardy - 2005 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 46 (2):165-171.
Cut normal forms and proof complexity.Matthias Baaz & Alexander Leitsch - 1999 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 97 (1-3):127-177.
An Introduction to Proof Theory.Samuel R. Buss - 2000 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (4):464-465.

View all 7 references / Add more references