Interpreting Plans: A Critical View of Scott Shapiro's Planning Theory of Law

Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 37:219-250 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,859

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Planning Theory of Law I: The Nature of Legal Institutions. [REVIEW]David Plunkett - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (2):149-158.
The Planning Theory of Law II: The Nature of Legal Norms.David Plunkett - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (2):159-169.
On Hart's category mistake.Michael S. Green - 2013 - Legal Theory 19 (4):347-369.
The Planning Theory and Natural Law.George Duke - 2015 - Law and Philosophy 34 (2):173-200.
Law as Plan and Artefact.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2016 - Jurisprudence 7 (2):325-340.
Scott J Shapiro between Positivism and Non-Positivism.Robert Alexy - 2016 - Jurisprudence 7 (2):299-306.
A Positivist Route for Explaining How Facts Make Law.David Plunkett - 2012 - Legal Theory 18 (2):139-207.
From Shared Agency to the Normativity of Law: Shapiro’s and Coleman’s Defence of Hart’s Practice Theory of Rules Reconsidered.Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco - 2009 - Law and Philosophy 28 (1):59 - 100.
Explaining legal agreement.Bill Watson - 2023 - Jurisprudence 14 (2):221-253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
28 (#887,122)

6 months
1 (#1,599,047)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Legality’s Law’s Empire.Nevin Johnson - 2020 - Law and Philosophy 39 (3):325-349.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references