The Covenant of the Wild: Why Animals Chose Domestication : with a New Preface

(1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Animal rights extremists argue that eating meat is murder and that pets are slaves. This compelling reappraisal of the human-animal bond, however, shows that domestication of animals is not an act of exploitation but a brilliantly successful evolutionary strategy that has benefited humans and animals alike.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,503

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
17 (#861,334)

6 months
7 (#418,756)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Animal Ethics of Temple Grandin: A Protectionist Analysis.Andy Lamey - 2019 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (1):1-22.
Is Natural Food Healthy?Helena Siipi - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (4):797-812.
Can natural behavior be cultivated? The farm as local human/animal culture.Pär Segerdahl - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (2):167-193.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references