Critics sometimes claim that Catholic moral principles unreasonably oblige patients to adopt life-preserving medical treatments “at all costs,” even when the treatments are excessively burdensome or futile and when their adoption may badly disadvantage patients’ family members or caregivers. The author argues that this is a mischaracterization. Because of obligations arising from our relationships, not only is it sometimes licit to refuse lifesustaining medical care, but we sometimes have a duty to refuse it. This is the case when the treatments are morally extraordinary and when adopting them would unfairly disadvantage someone for whom we have responsibility. The author argues that this conclusion is not inconsistent with the duty we have to properly care for our own lives or with moral principles prohibiting self-killing. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 12.4 : 621–630.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Business and Professional Ethics  Catholic Tradition
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1532-5490
DOI 10.5840/ncbq20121247
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,257
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Are Brain Dead Individuals Dead? Grounds for Reasonable Doubt.E. Christian Brugger - 2016 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41 (3):329-350.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Terminating Life-Sustaining Treatment--Recent US Developments.R. D. Mackay - 1988 - Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (3):135-139.
Can I Have a Duty to Believe in God?Jonathan Harrison - 1957 - Philosophy 32 (122):241 - 252.
Many Duties of Care—Or A Duty of Care? Notes From the Underground.David Howarth - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (3):449-472.
Justice and the Severely Demented Elderly.Dan W. Brock - 1988 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (1):73-99.
Futility, Autonomy, and Cost in End-of-Life Care.Mary Ann Baily - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):172-182.
A Duty to Adopt?Daniel Friedrich - 2013 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):25-39.
"Playing God" and the Removal of Life-Prolonging Therapy.J. J. Paris & M. Poorman - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (4):403-418.
Resource Allocation and the Duty to Give Reasons.John Stanton-Ife - 2006 - Health Care Analysis 14 (3):145-156.


Added to PP index

Total views
16 ( #663,031 of 2,499,776 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,066 of 2,499,776 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes