Intellectual History Review 22 (3):373-389 (2012)

Authors
Jacqueline Broad
Monash University
Abstract
In his De la recherche de la vérité (The Search after Truth) of 1674-75, Nicolas Malebranche makes a number of apparently contradictory remarks about women and their capacity for pure intellectual thought. On the one hand, he seems to espouse a negative biological determinism about women’s minds, and on the other, he suggests that women have the free capacity to attain truth and happiness, regardless of their physiology. In the early eighteenth-century, four English women thinkers – Anne Docwra (c. 1624-1710), Mary Astell (1666-1731), Damaris Masham (1659-1708), and Mary Chudleigh (1656-1710) – engaged with Malebranche’s ideas. Their writings reveal how we might dispel the apparent contradictions in Malebranche’s thinking about women, and reaffirm the liberating potential of Cartesian philosophy for women in the early modern period.
Keywords Nicolas Malebranche  women
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/17496977.2012.695187
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Occasionalism and General Will in Malebranche.Steven M. Nadler - 1993 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 31 (1):31-47.
Malebranche and His Heirs.Richard Acworth - 1977 - Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (4):673.
Causality and Human Freedom in Malebranche.Fred Ablondi - 1996 - Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):321-331.
Malebranche.Andrew Pyle - 2003 - Routledge.
The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche.Steven Nadler (ed.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Malebranche and Occasionalism: A Reply to Steven Nadler.Desmond M. Clarke - 1995 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (3):499-504.
Malebranche: Divinity, Responsibility, and Control of the Passions.Nathaniel Bowditch - 2010 - International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3):363-382.
Malebranche on Ideas.Andrew Pessin - 2004 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34 (2):241 - 285.
11 Malebranche's Life and Legacy.Andre Robinet - 2000 - In Steven M. Nadler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche. Cambridge University Press. pp. 288.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
263 ( #38,218 of 2,462,323 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #178,952 of 2,462,323 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes