Fallibilism: Evidence and Knowledge

Oxford: Oxford University Press (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Fallibilists claim that one can know a proposition on the basis of evidence that supports it even if the evidence doesn't guarantee its truth. Jessica Brown offers a compelling defence of this view against infallibilists, who claim that it is contradictory to claim to know and yet to admit the possibility of error.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Jessica Brown: Fallibilism: Evidence and Knowledge.Matthew McGrath - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy 116 (11):637-644.
Jessica Brown, Fallibilism: Evidence and Knowledge. [REVIEW]Ante Debeljuh - 2022 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 22 (3):415-418.
Precis of fallibilism: evidence and knowledge.Jessica Brown - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (8):2639-2642.
Refuting two dilemmas for infallibilism.Giada Fratantonio & Maria Lasonen-Aarnio - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (8):2643-2654.
Theorizing about evidence.Timothy Williamson - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (8):2697-2705.
Frontloading, Supposition, and Contraction.Bryan Pickel - 2016 - Philosophical Quarterly 66 (264):559-578.
Harman's paradox.Tom Sorell - 1981 - Mind 90 (360):557-575.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-13

Downloads
50 (#327,457)

6 months
23 (#125,194)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jessica Brown
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

Reliabilist Epistemology.Alvin Goldman & Bob Beddor - 2021 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Being More Realistic About Reasons: On Rationality and Reasons Perspectivism.Clayton Littlejohn - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (3):605-627.
The Fundamental Problem of Logical Omniscience.Peter Hawke, Aybüke Özgün & Francesco Berto - 2020 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 49 (4):727-766.
Why Double-Check?Elise Woodard - forthcoming - Episteme:1-24.
Norms of Inquiry.Eliran Haziza - 2023 - Philosophy Compass 18 (12):e12952.

View all 61 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references