The upper courts: Scholarship and authority

Social Epistemology 5 (1):16 – 19 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

1995

DOI

10.1080/02691729108578592

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Laughing whitefish: A tale of justice and anishinaabe custom.Matthew L. M. Fletcher - unknown
Which countries count? Lawrence V. texas and the selection of foreign persuasive authority.Rex D. Glensy - manuscript
Strangers in a strange land: Specialized courts resolving patent disputes.Lawrence M. Sung - manuscript
A government of laws and not men: Prohibiting non-precedential opinions by statute or procedural rule.Amy E. Sloan - unknown
After.Bernard H. Chao - manuscript
Legal scholarship as an act of discovery.L. Ali Khan - manuscript
The Role of Authority.Scott Hershovitz - 2011 - Philosophers' Imprint 11.
On the epistemic authority of courts.Alex Stein - 2008 - Episteme 5 (3):pp. 402-410.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-04

Downloads
18 (#827,632)

6 months
1 (#1,463,894)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Brigham
University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Natural Right and History (Chicago, 1953).Leo Strauss - 1953 - The Correspondence Between Ethical Egoists and Natural Rights Theorists is Considerable Today, as Suggested by a Comparison of My" Recent Work in Ethical Egoism," American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (2):1-15.

Add more references