Authors
Ingo Brigandt
University of Alberta
Abstract
The present paper gives a philosophical analysis of the conceptual variation in the homology concept. It is argued that different homology concepts are used in evolutionary and comparative biology, in evolutionary developmental biology, and in molecular biology. The study uses conceptual role semantics, focusing on the inferences and explanations supported by concepts, as a heuristic tool to explain conceptual change. The differences between homology concepts are due to the fact that these concepts play different theoretical roles for different biological fields. The specific theoretical needs and explanatory interests of different research approaches lead to different homology concepts.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2003, 2004
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,008
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Thought.Gilbert Harman - 1973 - Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Representing and Intervening.Ian Hacking - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (4):381-390.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Biological Kinds and the Causal Theory of Reference.Ingo Brigandt - 2004 - In J. C. Marek & M. E. Reicher (eds.), Experience and Analysis: Papers of the 27th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Kirchberg am Wechsel: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society. pp. 58–60.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
124 ( #94,120 of 2,505,153 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,142 of 2,505,153 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes