TheL <ω-theory of the class of Archimedian real closed fields

Archive for Mathematical Logic 28 (3):155-166 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For the classA of uncountable Archimedian real closed fields we show that the statement “TheL <ω-theory ofA is complete” is independent of ZFC. In particular we have the following results:Assuming the Continuum-Hypothesis (CH) is incomplete. Conversely it is possible to build a model of set theory in which is complete and decidable. The latter can also be deduced from the Proper Forcing Axiom (PFA). In this case turns out to be equivalent to the elementary theory of the real numbers ℝ (by a quantifier-elimination procedure).Formally: is incomplete. is complete and decidable

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

T-Convexity and Tame Extensions.Dries Lou Van Den & H. Lewenberg Adam - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):74 - 102.
T-convexity and Tame extensions.LouDen Dries & Adam H. Lewenberg - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):74 - 102.
Scott incomplete Boolean ultrapowers of the real line.Masanao Ozawa - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):160-171.
$t$-convexity And Tame Extensions.Lou van den Dries & Adam H. Lewenberg - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (1):74-102.
Incompatible Ω-Complete Theories.Peter Koellner & W. Hugh Woodin - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (4):1155 - 1170.
An Intuitionistic Axiomatisation of Real Closed Fields.Erik Palmgren - 2002 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (2):297-299.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
44 (#352,056)

6 months
6 (#700,231)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations