Incompatible Ω-Complete Theories

Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (4):1155 - 1170 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In 1985 the second author showed that if there is a proper class of measurable Woodin cardinals and $V^{B1} $ and $V^{B2} $ are generic extensions of V satisfying CH then $V^{B1} $ and $V^{B2} $ agree on all $\Sigma _1^2 $ -statements. In terms of the strong logic Ω-logic this can be reformulated by saying that under the above large cardinal assumption ZFC + CH is Ω-complete for $\Sigma _1^2 $ Moreover. CH is the unique $\Sigma _1^2 $ -statement with this feature in the sense that any other $\Sigma _1^2 $ -statement with this feature is Ω-equivalent to CH over ZFC. It is natural to look for other strengthenings of ZFC that have an even greater degree of Ω-completeness. For example, one can ask for recursively enumerable axioms A such that relative to large cardinal axioms ZFC + A is Ω-complete for all of third-order arithmetic. Going further, for each specifiable segment $V_\lambda $ of the universe of sets (for example, one might take $V_\lambda $ to be the least level that satisfies there is a proper class of huge cardinals), one can ask for recursively enumerable axioms A such that relative to large cardinal axioms ZFC + A is Ω-complete for the theory of $V_\lambda $ . If such theories exist, extend one another, and are unique in the sense that any other such theory B with the same level of Ω-completeness as A is actually Ω-equivalent to A over ZFC, then this would show that there is a unique Ω-complete picture of the successive fragments of the universe of sets and it would make for a very strong case for axioms complementing large cardinal axioms. In this paper we show that uniqueness must fail. In particular, we show that if there is one such theory that Ω-implies CH then there is another that Ω-implies¬CH



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,479

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hierarchies of Forcing Axioms II.Itay Neeman - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (2):522 - 542.
Ramsey-like cardinals.Victoria Gitman - 2011 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 76 (2):519 - 540.
PFA and Ideals on $\omega_{2}$ Whose Associated Forcings Are Proper.Sean Cox - 2012 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (3):397-412.
An ideal characterization of mahlo cardinals.Qi Feng - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (2):467-473.
Complete theories with only universal and existential axioms.A. H. Lachlan - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (3):698-711.
On dedekind complete o-minimal structures.Anand Pillay & Charles Steinhorn - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (1):156-164.
Gap forcing: Generalizing the lévy-Solovay theorem.Joel David Hamkins - 1999 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):264-272.
Projective Well-Orderings and Bounded Forcing Axioms.Andrés Eduardo Caicedo - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (2):557 - 572.
Large cardinals and large dilators.Andy Lewis - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (4):1496-1510.
Laver sequences for extendible and super-almost-huge cardinals.Paul Corazza - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):963-983.
Hierarchies of forcing axioms I.Itay Neeman & Ernest Schimmerling - 2008 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 73 (1):343-362.


Added to PP

70 (#174,031)

6 months
5 (#155,590)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Peter Koellner
Harvard University
W. Hugh Woodin
Harvard University

References found in this work

[Omnibus Review].Akihiro Kanamori - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (4):864-866.
On the question of absolute undecidability.Peter Koellner - 2010 - In Kurt Gödel, Solomon Feferman, Charles Parsons & Stephen G. Simpson (eds.), Philosophia Mathematica. Association for Symbolic Logic. pp. 153-188.
A Δ22 well-order of the reals and incompactness of L.Uri Abraham & Saharon Shelah - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 59 (1):1-32.

Add more references