Uncertainty, Learning, and the “Problem” of Dilation

Erkenntnis 79 (6):1287-1303 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Imprecise probabilism—which holds that rational belief/credence is permissibly represented by a set of probability functions—apparently suffers from a problem known as dilation. We explore whether this problem can be avoided or mitigated by one of the following strategies: (a) modifying the rule by which the credal state is updated, (b) restricting the domain of reasonable credal states to those that preclude dilation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The dispositional account of credence.Anna Mahtani - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (3):727-745.
Demystifying Dilation.Arthur Paul Pedersen & Gregory Wheeler - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (6):1305-1342.
Comparative Opinion Loss.Benjamin Eva & Reuben Stern - 2022 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 107 (3):613-637.
Imprecise Bayesianism and Global Belief Inertia.Aron Vallinder - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (4):1205-1230.
A dilemma for the imprecise bayesian.Namjoong Kim - 2016 - Synthese 193 (6):1681-1702.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
108 (#167,369)

6 months
26 (#115,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Seamus Bradley
London School of Economics (PhD)
Katie Steele
Australian National University