Moore, Russell, and the Foundations of Analytic Metaphysics

Philosophy Research Archives 7:553-581 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is the general nature or logical status of existence? This question is the (logically) first question of ontology. Moore, in his early article "The Nature of Judgment", and Russell, in The Principles of Mathematics, offer the same answer to it, and their answer has philosophical—as well as historical—importance. Existence is what Moore calls a "concept" and what Russell calls a "term". The chief features of the early Moore-Russell ontology, their attempt to understand the ultimate constituents of the world and the connections among them, are delineated and evaluated. Though their ontology has its successes (e.g., a useful, univocal concept of existence), it ultimately is a failure, and the reasons for its failure are deeply rooted and instructive.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Logic and Metaphysics in Early Analytic Philosophy.Michael Beaney - 2012 - In Lila Haaparanta & Heikki Koskinen (eds.), Categories of Being: Essays on Metaphysics and Logic. Oxford University Press, Usa. pp. 257.
Ethics Dehumanized.Panayot Butchvarov - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (s):165-183.
Perception and Sense Data.Gary Hatfield - 2013 - In Michael Beaney (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytical Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 948-974.
G. E. Moore: Selected Writings.George Edward Moore - 1993 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Thomas Baldwin.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
20 (#767,424)

6 months
1 (#1,471,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references