Coherence arguments and cyclical moral rankings

Philosophical Studies 74 (3):369 - 384 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that we can generate intransitive preference orderings for a single person on the model of Sen's Libertarian Paradox.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00989701

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The coherence argument against conditionalization.Matthias Hild - 1998 - Synthese 115 (2):229-258.
Computation, coherence, and ethical reasoning.Marcello Guarini - 2007 - Minds and Machines 17 (1):27-46.
On the alleged impossibility of coherence.Wouter Meijs & Igor Douven - 2007 - Synthese 157 (3):347 - 360.
A mistake in dynamic coherence arguments?Brian Skyrms - 1993 - Philosophy of Science 60 (2):320-328.
Are moral philosophers moral experts?Bernward Gesang - 2008 - Bioethics 24 (4):153-159.
Moral Rationalism and the Normative Status of Desiderative Coherence.Patricia Marino - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (2):227-252.
Moral disagreement concerning abortion.Bernard Gert - 2010 - Diametros 26:23-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
109 (#161,436)

6 months
8 (#353,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luc Bovens
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Ethical Consistency.B. A. O. Williams & W. F. Atkinson - 1965 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 39 (1):103-138.

Add more references