The Existential Dimension of Moral Experience

Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 17:74-94 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

MY programme is as follows: I shall draw a general distinction between morals and moral philosophy in order to show that an ethical theory cannot be neutral and autonomous but must have an empirical foundation. Both ethical naturalists and existentialists agree that an adequate moral theory must be based on anthropological considerations. They however differ on one major issue: ethical naturalists maintain that such a theory must be scientifically grounded, existentialists that it must be grounded on experience phenomenologically described. The weakness of the naturalists’ position becomes apparent when some anthropological notion like the concept of action is clarified, since human behaviour of a morally relevant kind cannot be fully understood from a scientific point of view.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Existential Condition at the Millennium.Ralph D. Ellis - 1999 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6 (3-4):51-57.
The axiology of moral experience.Robert Audi - 1998 - The Journal of Ethics 2 (4):355-375.
Moral perception and the pursuit of medical philosophy.David J. Casarett - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (2):125-139.
How a Map Works in the Land Arts.Sukyung Chung - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 12:9-17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
33 (#477,809)

6 months
1 (#1,491,286)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references