Ethics of Research in Clinical Emergencies: UK Regulation Inconsistent with European Law

Research Ethics 3 (3):97-100 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In December 2006 there was an amendment to the Medicines for Human Use Regulations 2004, the statutory instrument that translated the European directive into UK law. I will demonstrate how the European directive stifled much needed clinical research in urgent critical states whilst there is an international consensus that research in these situations be allowed. The amendments to the UK Medicines for Human Use Regulations 2004 in allowing such exception have failed to preserve the high degree of respect and protection of the participants' interest as reflected in the spirit of the numerous guidelines, conventions and laws appertaining to the ethics of research in clinical emergencies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Informed consent in emergency research: A contradiction in terms.Malcolm G. Booth - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (3):351-359.
Harmonization of Ethics Policies in Pediatric Research.Valarie Blake, Steve Joffe & Eric Kodish - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (1):70-78.
Regulating stem cell research in Europe by the back door.S. Holm - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (4):203-204.
Biobank Report: United Kingdom.Jane Kaye, Jessica Bell, Linda Briceno & Colin Mitchell - 2016 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 44 (1):96-105.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
9 (#449,242)

6 months
3 (#1,723,834)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references