Can mutualistic morality predict how individuals deal with benefits they did not deserve?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):83-83 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An individual obtains an unfair benefit and faces the dilemma of either hiding it (to avoid being excluded from future interactions) or disclosing it (to avoid being discovered as a deceiver). In line with the target article, we expect that this dilemma will be solved by a fixed individual strategy rather than a case-by-case rational calculation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The limits of individualism are not the limits of rationality.Susan Hurley - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):164-165.
Not all mutualism is fair, and not all fairness is mutualistic.Alex Shaw & Joshua Knobe - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):100 - 101.
Avoid the push-pull dilemma in explanation.Kenneth M. Steele - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (2):233-234.
Expectations and morality: A dilemma.Eric Mandelbaum & David Ripley - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (4):346-346.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
18 (#860,222)

6 months
8 (#415,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references