Philosophia 48 (3):873-892 (2020)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Many philosophers believe that our ordinary English words man and woman are “gender terms,” and gender is distinct from biological sex. That is, they believe womanhood and manhood are not defined even partly by biological sex. This sex/gender distinction is one of the most influential ideas of the twentieth century on the broader culture, both popular and academic. Less well known are the reasons to think it’s true. My interest in this paper is to show that, upon investigation, the arguments for the sex/gender distinction have feet of clay. In fact, they all fail. We will survey the literature and tour arguments in favor of the sex/gender distinction, and then we’ll critically evaluate those arguments. We’ll consider the argument from resisting biological determinism, the argument from biologically intersex people and vagueness, the argument from the normativity of gender, and some arguments from thought experiments. We’ll see that these arguments are not up to the task of supporting the sex/gender distinction; they simply don’t work. So, philosophers should either develop stronger arguments for the sex/gender distinction, or cultivate a variety of feminism that’s consistent with the traditional, biologically-based definitions of woman and man.
|
Keywords | sex/gender distinction gender transgender ameliorative inquiry conceptual engineering philosophy of gender woman |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11406-019-00157-6 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique.Sally Haslanger - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
View all 30 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Ending Sex-Based Oppression: Transitional Pathways.Holly Lawford-Smith - 2020 - Philosophia 49 (3):1021-1041.
Sex and Gender in Sport Categorization: Aiming for Terminological Clarity.Irena Martínková, Taryn Knox, Lynley Anderson & Jim Parry - 2022 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 49 (1):134-150.
Similar books and articles
Ontological Commitments, Sex and Gender.Mari Mikkola - 2011 - In Charlotte Witt (ed.), Feminist Metaphysics. Springer. pp. 67--83.
A Dispositional Account of Gender.Jennifer McKitrick - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (10):2575-2589.
Gender Identity and Exclusion: A Reply to Jenkins.Matthew Salett Andler - 2017 - Ethics 127 (4):883-895.
Some Internal Problems with Revisionary Gender Concepts.Tomas Bogardus - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (1):55-75.
Endless Sex: The Gender Recognition Act 2004 and the Persistence of a Legal Category. [REVIEW]Andrew N. Sharpe - 2007 - Feminist Legal Studies 15 (1):57-84.
Thinking Woman: A Philosophical Approach to the Quandary of Gender.Dragseth Jennifer Hockenbery - 2015 - Eugene, Oregon, USA: Cascade Books.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-12-17
Total views
8,119 ( #264 of 2,499,360 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1,740 ( #114 of 2,499,360 )
2019-12-17
Total views
8,119 ( #264 of 2,499,360 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1,740 ( #114 of 2,499,360 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads