Empiricism and After

Abstract

Familiar versions of empiricism overemphasize and misconstrue the importance of perceptual experience. I discuss their main shortcomings and sketch an alternative framework for thinking about how human sensory systems contribute to scientific knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

An Empirical Critique of Empiricism.Richard De Brasi & Joseph R. Laracy - 2013 - Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 16 (4):124-163.
Perception, Empiricism, and Pragmatist Realism.Serge Grigoriev - 2011 - Contemporary Pragmatism 8 (1):191-210.
Is Empiricism Coherent?Albert Casullo - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:61-74.
What is constructive empiricism?Gideon Rosen - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 74 (2):143 - 178.
Concept empiricism, content, and compositionality.Collin Rice - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 162 (3):567-583.
Choosing the realist framework.Stathis Psillos - 2011 - Synthese 180 (2):301 - 316.
Agnostic empiricism versus scientific realism: Belief in truth matters.Stathis Psillos - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (1):57 – 75.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-07

Downloads
73 (#221,697)

6 months
12 (#202,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Bogen
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Theory and observation in science.Jim Bogen - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A Dilemma about the Mental.Guy Dove & Andreas Elpidorou - 2021 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 1.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references