The Metaphysics of William Ockham

Review of Metaphysics 1 (4):59-86 (1948)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is unnecessary to make a direct refutation of these and similar statements and insinuations which occur frequently in the fast growing literature on medieval thought. The fact is, Ockham does have a Metaphysics. It could even be called a well-developed Metaphysics. To show that this is the case, is already to refute completely the denials that Ockham has a Metaphysics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Metaphysics of William Ockham.Philotheus Boehner - 1948 - Review of Metaphysics 1 (4):59 - 86.
Predestination, Foreknowledge, and Future Contingents.William of Ockham - 1969 - Indianapolis: Hackett. Edited by Marilyn McCord Adams & Norman Kretzmann.
Philosophical Writings: A Selection.William of Ockham - 1957 - London, England: Hackett. Edited by Philotheus Boehner.
William Ockham. [REVIEW]William A. Frank - 1989 - Review of Metaphysics 42 (4):817-818.
William of Ockham and the Divine Freedom. [REVIEW]Timothy B. Noone - 1994 - Review of Metaphysics 48 (1):142-144.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
17 (#863,882)

6 months
1 (#1,461,875)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references