The End of Environmental Law?: Libertarian Property, Natural Law, and the Just Compensation Clause in the Federal Circuit

Environmental Law 25 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines two Federal Circuit decisions handed down in the wake of the Supreme Court's rulings in Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Comm'n and Dolan v. City of Tigard, in which the Federal Circuit indicated it would impose much more exacting scrutiny on federal regulations than the Supreme Court. In one case, Florida Rock Industries v. U.S., the Federal Circuit approved a just compensation for a partial taking of property. In the other, Loveladies Harbor, Inc. v. U.S., the court ruled that the relevant parcel was only the wetlands burdened by the regulation, not the entire original tract owned and developed by the claimant.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,611

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Endangered Species Act, Regulatory Takings, and Public Goods.N. Scott Arnold - 2009 - Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (2):353-377.
Justice and the Just Compensation Clause: A New Approach to Economic Development Takings.John Goodwin - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 24 (1):219-254.
The Libertarian Error.Richard Oxenberg - 2017 - Political Animal Magazine.
Excluding Destruction.John Hadley - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):22-29.
The Dual Role of Property Rights in Protecting Broadcast Speech.Thomas W. Hazlett - 1998 - Social Philosophy and Policy 15 (2):176-208.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-28

Downloads
2 (#1,809,554)

6 months
1 (#1,478,830)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references