The Epistemology of Immortality: Searle, Pomponazzi, and Ficino

Studia Neoaristotelica 9 (1):85-102 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The relationship between body and mind was traditionally discussed in terms of immortality of the intellect, because immateriality was one necessary condition for the mind to be immortal. This appeared to be an issue of metaphysics and religion. But to the medieval and Renaissance thinkers, the essence of mind is thinking activity and hence an epistemological feature. Starting with John Searle’s worries about the existence of consciousness, I try to show some parallels with the Aristotelian Pietro Pomponazzi (1462–1525), and eventually show the Neoplatonic approach in Marsilio Ficino (1433–1499). The guiding question is: how can one philosophically address the problem of cognition in terms of corporeality and incorporeality? Searle maintains there is mind, although essentially related to a biological basis, and he is comparable to the Renaissance thinkers for his taking the interaction of the mental and the corporeal seriously

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Marsilio Ficino (1433-1499) : The Aesthetic of the One in the Soul.Tamara Albertini - 2010 - In Paul Richard Blum (ed.), Philosophers of the Renaissance. Catholic University of America Press. pp. 82-91.
Fantasy and imagination in Ficino, Marsilio and pomponazzi, Pietro.E. Garin - 1985 - Giornale Critico Della Filosofia Italiana 5 (3):349-361.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-18

Downloads
86 (#192,658)

6 months
9 (#437,668)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Richard Blum
Loyola University Maryland

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references