Neuroethics 6 (2):319-330 (2013)

Authors
Robyn Bluhm
Michigan State University
Abstract
Neuroscience research examining sex/gender differences aims to explain behavioral differences between men and women in terms of differences in their brains. Historically, this research has used ad hoc methods and has been conducted explicitly in order to show that prevailing gender roles were dictated by biology. I examine contemporary fMRI research on sex/gender differences in emotion processing and argue that it, too, both uses problematic methods and, in doing so, reinforces gender stereotypes
Keywords Neuroimaging  fMRI  Epistemology  Sex/gender differences  Philosophy of science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-011-9143-3
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Images Are Not the Evidence in Neuroimaging.Colin Klein - 2010 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):265-278.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Sex, Gender, and Science.Myra J. Hird - 2004 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Methodological Issues in the Construction of Gender as a Meaningful Variable in Scientific Studies of Cognition.Phyllis Rooney - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:109 - 119.
Sex Differences and Neuroethics.Peggy DesAutels - 2010 - Philosophical Psychology 23 (1):95-111.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-11-19

Total views
184 ( #64,608 of 2,518,147 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #408,577 of 2,518,147 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes