Critical Remarks on an Argumentation by K. Popper and D. Miller: Discussion about Induction

Epistemologia 7 (2):183-203 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Methodological Objectivism and Critical Rationalist ’Induction’.Alfred Schramm - 2006 - In Ian Jarvie, Karl Milford & David Miller (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, Volume Ii. Ashgate.
The Contrast Between Dogmatic and Critical Arguments.Danny Frederick - 2015 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 22 (1):9-20.
On a recent objection to Popper and Miller's "disproof" of probabilistic induction.Colin Howson - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (4):675-680.
Probabilité et support inductif. Sur le théorème de Popper-Miller.Guillaume Rochefort-Maranda - 2004 - Dialogue 43 (3):499-526.
Deduction, induction and probabilistic support.James Cussens - 1996 - Synthese 108 (1):1 - 10.
Popper on induction.Andrew J. Swann - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (3):367-373.
How Popper [might have] solved the problem of induction.Alan Musgrave - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (1):19-31.
A suspicious feature of the popper/miller argument.I. J. Good - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (3):535-536.
Conjectural knowledge: Popper's solution of the problem of induction.David Miller - 1982 - In Karl R. Popper & Paul Levinson (eds.), In Pursuit of Truth: Essays on the Philosophy of Karl Popper on the Occasion of His 80th Birthday. Harvester Press. pp. 17--49.
Inductive Support.Georg J. W. Dorn - 1991 - In Gerhard Schurz & Georg J. W. Dorn (eds.), Advances in Scientific Philosophy. Essays in Honour of Paul Weingartner on the Occasion of the 60th Anniversary of his Birthday. Rodopi. pp. 345.
Argumentative Bluff in Eristic Discussion: An Analysis and Evaluation.Jan Albert van Laar - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):383-398.
Induction, Simplicity and Scientific Progress.Nicholas Maxwell - 1979 - Scientia 114 (14):629-653.
Inductive countersupport.Georg J. W. Dorn - 1995 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 26 (1):187 - 189.
A.F. Snoeck Henkemans,analysing complex argumentation: The reconstruction of multiple and coordinatively compound argumentation in a critical discussion. [REVIEW]Robert C. Pinto - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):314-318.
Hume, Popper y el problema epistemológico de la inducción.José Andrés Forero Mora - 2012 - Logos: Revista de la Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades 21:179-191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-08

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references