- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Difference Between the Scope of a Norm and Its Apparent Source
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41:E97 (2018)
Abstract
We should distinguish between the apparent source of a norm and the scope of the norm's satisfaction conditions. Wide-scope social norms need not be externalised, and externalised social norms need not be wide in scope. Attending to this distinction leads to a problem for Stanford: The adaptive advantages he attributes to externalised norms are actually advantages of wide-scope norms.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
mean two or more people in interaction observing social norms that can be traced back to one and the same norm source (norm speaker). As the norm source pronounces norms, and by sanctions (reward or punishment) strives to build up uniform behaviour, I think the group at the the same time may be defined as a system.Torgny T. Segerstedt - 1963 - In Gunnar Aspelin (ed.), Philosophical essays. Lund,: CWK Gleerup. pp. 219.
The Cosmopolitan Turn and the Primacy of Difference.Guoping Zhao - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 49 (4):510-524.
The topological complexity of a natural class of norms on Banach spaces.Gilles Godefroy, Mohammed Yahdi & Robert Kaufman - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 111 (1-2):3-13.
Problems of the Stufenbaulehre: Kelsen’s Failure to Derive the Validity of a Norm from Another Norm.András Jakab - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20 (1):35-68.
How to Be a Pessimist about Aesthetic Testimony.Robert Hopkins - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy 108 (3):138-157.
A Ética da Crença: uma Defesa Moderada da Posição Indiciária.Eros Carvalho - 2018 - Sofia 7 (1):17-40.
The basic Norm and democracy in Hans kelsen’s legal and political theory.Andreas Kalyvas - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (5):573-599.
Probleme der Stufenbaulehre.András Jakab - 2005 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 91 (3):333-365.
Probleme der Stufenbaulehre Das Scheitern des Ableitungsgedankens und die Aussichten der Reinen Rechtslehre.András Jakab - 2005 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 91 (3):333-365.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-05-19
Downloads
66 (#245,290)
6 months
7 (#421,763)
2018-05-19
Downloads
66 (#245,290)
6 months
7 (#421,763)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-b9rvg uwo