Constructivism, nativism, and explanatory adequacy

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):557-558 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Constructivism is the most recent in a long line of failed attempts to discredit nativism. It seeks support from true (but irrelevant) facts, wastes its energy on straw men, and jumps logical gaps; but its greatest weakness lies in its failure to match nativism's explanation of a wide range of disparate phenomena, particularly in language acquisition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,420

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nativism, neuroconstructivism, and developmental disorder.Philip Gerrans - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):757-758.
Autonomy and its discontents.Chris Sinha - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (4):647-648.
“Parallel architecture” as a variety of stratificationalism.David G. Lockwood - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):686-687.
A premature retreat to nativism.Jeffrey L. Sokolov & Catherine E. Snow - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (4):635-636.
What’s Within? Nativism Reconsidered.Fiona Cowie - 1998 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Grades of nativism.Norbert Hornstein - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (2):195.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
60 (#264,372)

6 months
13 (#281,206)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references