A comparison of the German and Russian literary intelligentsia in Arnold Hauser’s Social History of Art

Studies in East European Thought 71 (2):141-155 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To date, critical engagement with Arnold Hauser’s sociology of art has been confined to the field of art history. This perspective has ignored Hauser’s interest in literary history, which I argue is essential to his project. Hauser’s dialectical model, composed of conflicting realist and formalist tendencies, extends to the literary sphere. In The Social History of Art, these two traditions are epitomised by the Russian social novel and German idealism. Anti-enlightenment tendencies in German intellectual culture provide Hauser with evidence of idealism’s propensity for escapism and reaction. Conversely, he extols the Russian social novel as the naturalistic art form par excellence. Because the intelligentsia is central to Hauser’s understanding of the formation of literary culture, this paper provides an outline of his sociology of intellectuals. Through a comparison of the German and Russian literary intelligentsia, this paper shows that Hauser’s analysis of literature is often more complex than his sociological interpretations of the visual arts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gombrich’s critique of Hauser’s Social History of Art.Jim Berryman - 2017 - History of European Ideas 43 (5):494-506.
Arnold Hauser and the multilayer theory of knowledge.Deodáth Zuh - 2015 - Studies in East European Thought 67 (1-2):41-59.
The "l'art pour l'art" Problem.Arnold Hauser & Kenneth Northcott - 1979 - Critical Inquiry 5 (3):425-440.
Intelligentsia Like a Challenge: the Identity of the Russian Intelligentsia in the 21st Century.О. M. Zdravomyslova & N. V. Kutukova - 2020 - Концепт: Философия, Религия, Культура 4 (1):7-20.
Belinsky and the Sociality of Reason.Vadim Shkolnikov - 2021 - In Marina F. Bykova, Michael N. Forster & Lina Steiner (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Russian Thought. Springer Verlag. pp. 507-524.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-28

Downloads
26 (#599,981)

6 months
8 (#507,683)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jim Berryman
University of Glasgow

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dialectic of enlightenment: philosophical fragments.Max Horkheimer - 2002 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by Theodor W. Adorno & Gunzelin Schmid Noerr.
Against the current: essays in the history of ideas.Isaiah Berlin - 1980 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Edited by Henry Hardy.
Gombrich’s critique of Hauser’s Social History of Art.Jim Berryman - 2017 - History of European Ideas 43 (5):494-506.

View all 10 references / Add more references