How we can agree to disagree

Abstract

Knowledge entails the truth of the proposition known; that which is merely believed may be false. If I have beliefs about your beliefs, then I may believe that some of your beliefs are false. I may believe, for example, that you mistakenly believe that it is now raining outside. This is a coherent belief for me, though not for you. You cannot coherently believe that you believe falsely that it is raining, and this despite the fact that your having that false belief is clearly a logical possibility. The proposition is, for you, a kind of doxastic blindspot.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Does belief have an aim?David John Owens - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 115 (3):283-305.
Varieties of interpersonal compatibility of beliefs.Giacomo Bonanno - 1999 - In Jelle Gerbrandy, Maarten Marx, Maarten de Rijke & Yde Venema (eds.), Essays dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the occasion of his 50th birthday. Amsterdam University Press.
Is there a right to be wrong?David S. Oderberg - 2000 - Philosophy 75 (4):517-537.
The epistemology of belief.Hamid Vahid - 2009 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Propositional knowledge.Ernest Sosa - 1969 - Philosophical Studies 20 (3):33 - 43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
519 (#34,066)

6 months
52 (#79,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

People with Common Priors Can Agree to Disagree.Harvey Lederman - 2015 - Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):11-45.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Empiricism and the philosophy of mind.Wilfrid Sellars - 1956 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1:253-329.
Belief and the Will.Bas C. van Fraassen - 1984 - Journal of Philosophy 81 (5):235-256.
Belief and the will.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2010 - In Antony Eagle (ed.), Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings. New York: Routledge. pp. 235-256.
Clever bookies and coherent beliefs.David Christensen - 1991 - Philosophical Review 100 (2):229-247.
Conditionalization and observation.Paul Teller - 1973 - Synthese 26 (2):218-258.

View all 6 references / Add more references