Set Theory With and Without Urelements and Categories of Interpretations

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (1):83-91 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show that the theories ZF and ZFU are synonymous, answering a question of Visser

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Amphi-ZF : axioms for Conway games.Michael Cox & Richard Kaye - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (3-4):353-371.
On Interpretations of Arithmetic and Set Theory.Richard Kaye & Tin Lok Wong - 2007 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 48 (4):497-510.
Heyting-valued interpretations for constructive set theory.Nicola Gambino - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 137 (1-3):164-188.
The logic of closed categories.Manfred E. Szabo - 1977 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 18 (3):441-457.
A note on "P"-admissible sets with urelements.Judy Green - 1975 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 16:415.
Antifoundation and Transitive Closure in the System of Zermelo.Olivier Esser & Roland Hinnion - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (2):197-205.
Three substitution-instance interpretations.John T. Kearns - 1978 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (3):331-354.
The Modal Logic of Cluster-Decomposable Kripke Interpretations.Michael Tiomkin & Michael Kaminski - 2007 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 48 (4):511-520.
Closed categories and categorical grammar.Daniel J. Dougherty - 1992 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34 (1):36-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
40 (#410,818)

6 months
14 (#200,872)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Benedikt Löwe
University of Amsterdam

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references