George C. Christie, the notion of an ideal audience in legal argument

Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):59-71 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,533

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An improved factor based approach to precedential constraint.Adam Rigoni - 2015 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 23 (2):133-160.
Argument in artificial intelligence and law.Trevor Bench-Capon - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (4):249-261.
Is there a burden of questioning?Douglas Walton - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (1):1-43.
Review of Kevin Ashley, Modelling Legal Argument. [REVIEW]Michael Clark - 1992 - Law, Computing and Artificial Intelligence 1 (1).
Formalizing value-guided argumentation for ethical systems design.Bart Verheij - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 24 (4):387-407.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
51 (#347,854)

6 months
4 (#1,151,070)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The New Rhetoric.Charles Perelman & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca - 1957 - Philosophy Today 1 (1):4-10.
The pleadings game.Thomas F. Gordon - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (4):239-292.
Isomorphism and legal knowledge based systems.T. J. M. Bench-Capon & F. P. Coenen - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):65-86.
Argument in artificial intelligence and law.Trevor Bench-Capon - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (4):249-261.

Add more references