Benefit and harm

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (1):116-120 (1976)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I will first bring out some linguistic difficulties which suggest that the notions of benefit and harm are not as straightforwardly univocal as one might have thought, and then go on to make some distinctions within these notions which will bring to light their complexities, and help to clarify the relation between the good and the beneficial. The notion of the good and of the bene- ficial that are being used here are tied to human happiness. There are other conceptions of the good of man, and I may be mistaken in connecting it exclusively with human happiness, but the logical points concerning the concepts of benefit and harm will not be directly affected by this.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mortal harm.Steven Luper - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):239–251.
Should I Be Grateful to You for Not Harming Me?Saul Smilansky - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):585-597.
On the value of coming into existence.Nils Holtug - 2001 - The Journal of Ethics 5 (4):361-384.
The Moral Status of Enabling Harm.Samuel C. Rickless - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):66-86.
The harm principle.Nils Holtug - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):357-389.
The harm-benefit tradeoff in "bad deal" trials.Gillian Nycum & Lynette Reid - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (4):321-350.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
118 (#151,770)

6 months
47 (#90,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Theodore M. Benditt
University of Pittsburgh (PhD)

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references